this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
834 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

18984 readers
1482 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Great, let's tear down a well-preserved historic building in pristine condition for no absolute reason at all!

[–] KnowledgeableNip@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago

But God help you if you want to remove a statue honoring a Confederate general

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Typical urban real estate mogul behavior.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

old growth forest: *exists*

property developer: we got some undeveloped land here! let's pave it up, might make money having a parking lot.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might as well go back to the 1812 method of renovating at this point.
Probably less insulting to the concept of the USA than whatever the fuck this is.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the next president should tear down and start from scratch. Eho nlknows what kind of bugs that traitor has let his foreign 'pals' put wherever.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 1 month ago

I didn't think about that. Given how lax their opsec is that is a very possibility.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The east wing was built in like 1902. It's historic but it's not super duper old and was rebuilt in the 40s to hide a bunker under it.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still is historic and well-preserved.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Aside from 80 years of constant renovation sure.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly my biggest issue with this is that it seems to be a pretty clear sign (in addition to the other blatantly obvious signs like various public comments, selling Trump 2028 gear on his website, etc) that he has no intention of ever leaving the White House, term limits be damned. He's just not the type of person to do major work like that if he's expecting to move out and no longer be able to enjoy it himself in a few years.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, the white house is a living structure. Its been constantly renovated as long as its stood in order to meet the changing needs of running a country. Its what happens with most old structures, additions get made, more damaged or outdated sections get replaced, and ultimately the structure changes over time.

It also makes for some brilliant imagery of what Trump is doing to the country and he knows it. He's both literally and figuratively tearing down and replacing the seat of power, in ways that will be technically difficult, expensive and time consuming to restore or replace. And like any structure that gets a poorly conceived modification, his changes to the country won't be torn down and reverted to their earlier state, they'll most likely be dressed up, the most egregious flaws will be reworked, and some of Trumps changes will remain for a long time without update. Ideally all of Trumps changes will be torn down and a completely new structure will replace them, but that's ambitious, expensive and disruptive, plus if the wrong architect does so the entire structure can be far worse than it started.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually a well put metaphor.