this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
163 points (97.7% liked)
Microblog Memes
9606 readers
1793 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegemony#Media_and_communications_studies
this comes to mind, basically the kind of thinking in the OP represents a kind of corporate / capitalist hegemonic perspective - employers want you to sacrifice everything for them, ideally at any cost to your own health, liberty, etc., and there is a notion that if you align with those values you are a good worker - you should want to work all the time, you should feel bad for taking paid leave, etc.
This is in opposition to the kind of economic violence and desperation that faces wage workers - no Walmart store employee is being told they need to want to come in to work and not take paid leave, because those workers are already desperate for their wages and are probably relying on government aid programs to bridge the gap in their wages to pay for food.
Instead, in contexts where workers are not desperate and under immediate threat of losing shelter and food is where you find this kind of hegemonic messaging is so strong - the white collar employees who come into offices are the ones who are being made to feel guilty for taking paid leave, they are the ones who are expected to show up to work happy and self-motivated, and to want to be at work every day, to work in the evenings and over weekends without pay, etc. - that's hegemony, it operates through acceptance of a system of beliefs and values, and through self-regulation (rather than direct threats).
Its so wild because if you have motivated workers (my experience is from software development) you're going to produce so much more and better products, responding to problems so much faster. But if people have to act motivated it's way worse than even having unmotivated workers.
My bet is on middle & top management having absolutely zero empathy, so they cannot understand the difference.
Maybe they survive because predatory companies are not that liable to laws in todays society, but if they were, more humane companies would roll them over in productivity and quality. Or so I think.
You treated them as human beings. That's all.
is your point that brainwashing is more humane than a gun to the head? I'm not sure that's the best take-away, I wouldn't want to give the wrong impression that hegemony is primarily humanistic compared to more violent forms of imperialism ... Hegemony is more like self-harm propaganda, scams, and other malicious belief systems - it's just a form of power and control, and is no less coercive ... remember that the consequences of going against hegemony is often punishment, the alternative to accepting brainwashing is to have the gun to your head (if you don't cut it in an office environment, the alternative is desperate wage work).
Even when you don't fully endorse hegemony, you still behaviorally go along to avoid punishment, the self-regulation is cheaper and easier for those in power.
Further proof that anything can be argued!