97
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
97 points (98.0% liked)
politics
26306 readers
2812 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This reads like pure campaign theater wrapped in gaslighting. Trump promises a mysterious "$2000 dividend" while calling critics fools, then his Treasury guy says he hasn't even talked to him about it. Vague, uncosted, and probably designed to make headlines.
Remember how tariffs actually work: they are a tax on imports that businesses usually pass on to consumers, and they hit lower and middle income people harder. Where is the money really coming from, who defines "high income," and how do you square higher consumer prices with a big cash payout? It doesn't add up.
Short version, trust the details not the chest-thumping. If he actually wants to give people $2000, put a clear, audited plan on the table. Until then this is just noise.
Doesn't matter. Anyone who understands what tarrifs are isn't his target audience, the dullards who voted for him will just see a $2000 cheque with 'DONALD J. TRUMP' on the bottom and think that they got free money for nothing from king kiddyfucker.
Rumours will start in deep red communities that democrat voters didn’t get one, further proving Trump is their golden god as they high five and laugh.
Wonder how long $2000 will last, paying for all those tariffed goods. Wonder who will make the money in the end...
The argument for tariffs basically boils down to profit margin. If you're selling a $100 good into the US that cost you $15 to produce and another $5 to ship, there's a reason to believe you're willing to eat another $15 in import taxes to collect that $80 in profit.
If a business can pass the cost on to the consumer, the issue isn't strictly with the tariffs. It's the absence of alternatives at home that can retail for under $100.
But that's just "business math for dummies". Manufactured goods can cross borders multiple times in the assembling process. And with the sloppy execution of the tarrif, it seems like a single product can be taxed with each crossing. That's a bureaucratic trainwreck for a multitude of reasons. Businesses can't absorb these costs even with enormous margins.
Money comes from the Treasury. High income is a statutory definition. And you don't need to square it, because people aren't tracking the balance.
He's never done that before. Why start now?
Exactly