this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
983 points (99.1% liked)
People Twitter
8492 readers
1652 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not really comparable. I never claimed drawing/painting is easier, you're hallucinating. I'm talking about the competition where generating something isn't always easy.
Generating AI content requires zero skill or talent. You haven’t proven me wrong.
I literally proved you it requires skills by providing a page of example workflows. Are you still hallucinating?
No, you provided an example of how it’s difficult for YOU. Children can learn to create AI “art” within a week.
And a talented child artist would have what impact on your argument here?
A talented child artist wouldn’t use AI.
That was not the question.
The question is irrelevant. If the child has talent, they wouldn’t use AI. Moot point.
No.
Your argument is, 'it can't be art - a child can do it.'
Can children make art? Like, the way you understand art gets made. If a kid picking up Stable Diffusion in a week proves it's never art, what is the impact of a child who paints real good after very little practice?
Is that my argument? Cool! I guess my work is done here. You go ahead and debate the point you think I’m making. It’ll save me a whole lot of time, and you get to pretend to win!
We both get something out of it!
What the fuck are you saying, if not that?
If you can't be corrected when you misread someone else's argument you're just saying words recreationally.
You seem fine to fill in all the blanks you clearly can’t understand, I’d rather you just have this conversation all on your own.
I have faith in you!
(If you run into trouble, have AI do it for you).
YOU misread MY argument, and now - being asked to please explain what you're posturing about - you're posturing harder.
Do you care about this topic or are you just trolling?
I care about the topic. I don’t care about your take on it. I said what I intended to say, I’m not here to debate it.
AI is not art. And people who use it are not artists. I don’t care that it’s complicated to you. It’s not art. Period.
End of story.
If you want to argue, please continue rewriting my point and arguing against that, but leave me out of it.
Ah, so you just spit words into the void and mock anyone who tries engaging with them.
Troll.
God forbid anyone act like you believe the things you say, in a logical manner that can be interrogated or defended. You, the protagonist of reality, have spoken. End of story, period, other cliches meaning la la la not listening.
I don't think you have an argument. You've got a conclusion, yes, but when asked to even reiterate how you got there, all you have is performative sneering.
I’m a troll because I won’t argue with you? That’s not how trolling works. And if you want further evidence I’m not trolling, I’m going to block you because frankly, I’m tired of having to explain shit to you.
Trolls wouldn’t do that.
You haven't explained shit to me yet!
You don't know what explaining shit would look like!