this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
1160 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35516 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Which communist revolution? Russia was having famines before the soviet revolution. Its more reasonable to say communism solved the famines in russia and created them in china.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Eh the Soviets had plenty of their own man made famine (Holodomor, among others)

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 1 points 48 minutes ago

The Soviet Famine of the collectivization, which you inappropriately label "Holodomor" (scary word for a specific famine to make it sound like holocaust, I wonder if you have any other special scary words for other famines) is indeed an unfortunate event of Soviet History. Yet, you fail to see it in the bigger picture.

First of all, even during the famine, life expectancy remained higher than in Tsarist times, because of increasing access to healthcare and nutrition on average to peasants.

Secondly, the famine is an unfortunate consequence of the necessity of rapid collectivization and industrialization because of threat of external invasion. There was intense debate in the CPSU at the time regarding rapid collectivization and industrialization vs. progressive one, and ultimately rapid industrialization won because of the perceived threat of invasion by industrialized western powers with 100 years of industrialization behind their backs. Famously, in 1931, Stalin said in a speech that the USSR was 100 years behind and would have to make up for that difference in 10 years or they would be eliminated. Almost exactly 10 years later, Nazis invaded the Soviet Union.

By industrializing rapidly (15% yearly growth of GDP) thanks to rapid collectivization of agriculture, not only did the Soviet Union defeat Nazism and save every European nationality between Germany and the Urals from Nazi genocide (hence saving tens of millions of lives), but this rapid development managed to raise life expectancy from below 30 years old in 1929 to above 60 bu 1960, effectively saving tens of millions of lives more. By any demographic metric you use, compared to what came before (Tsarism) and what came after (capitalism), the USSR saved tens of millions of lives. Capitalism is the one that brought unemployment, hunger, drug abuse, violent crime, and a reduction of life expectancy after decades of progress.

Don't believe me? Go check the data:

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Lysenkoism was the cause of both Soviet and Chinese non-war related famines, a grand tragedy only possible under an authoritarian fever dream.

Ignore the lessons of history if you want, it just makes you the villain of the next cycle.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I don't think I've ever up voted a comment of yours. But you are 100% on point about Lysenko. His promotion and the treatment of Vavilov are emblematic of a few of the many many flaws of Leninism. Vavilov was at least posthumously exonerated.Though he still died in a Siberian gulag for the crime of disagreeing with comrade Stalin, and sticking to the evidence.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There was no one single cause, and trying to deflect blame onto a single (exceptionally whackdoodle) pseudoscientific theory is intellectually dishonest at best, and regular dishonest at worst.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Funny, because it and the pre-industrial cyclical famines ended when his policies did.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Man yeah, the fall of Lysenkoism is really the defining moment of mid-late 1940s soviet russia. Couldn't possibly have been any other factors which played into the shift in cultural attitudes within the soviet union at that time. Nope, must have been down to Lysenkoism itself falling out of favor.

~~Also it ended in the 60s and the last big soviet famine was in 47s so idk about that timeline~~

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, eventually the industrialization of Soviet farming paid off despite his nonsense.

Doesn't stop it from being the major cause (beyond deliberate genocidal policies) of the interwar famines. As you can provably see when it spread to Mao's newly formed Chinese state and, surprise, caused famines again when they didn't have the sheer output of an industrialized agrarianian sector to make up for it.

The Four Pests Campaign obviously didn't help in that regard but Lysenkoism was part and parcel of it, with Mao officially adopting it as state policy and Lysenkoism trained advisors setting specific policy goals.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, it was a pervasive piece of reasoning that existed in a system which would kill you if you tried to criticize the pseudoscience du jour. It had a large influence in soviet culture, yep, but it was absolutely not the sole driving force behind things like the Holodomor, or the other many famines.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If you don't want to understand why a system that forced workers and scientists to lie about production numbers or get shot caused famines during industrial centralization and was the absolute worst thing to have happening concurrently with a direct causal link in two separate countries I can't make you.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

So your argument is that it wasn't just Lysenkoism, but the political situation at the time which exacerbated the faults of Lysenkoism and lead to conditions allowing for those famines?

Which has incidentally been my entire point this whole time?

^edit:^ ^clarity^

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Everything is contextual and interconnected, but it was Lysenkoism, only possible under authorianism, that broke the core structural principle of a central command economy.

Lysenkoism isn't a reference to the actions of Lysenko, it refers to the entire system of failures that created it.

Lysenko's politically derived pseudoscience that started with ideology instead of evidence combined with Stalinist/Maoist paranoia and conflation of scientific dissent with rebellion and threats to the state created the famines from what would have been shortages during the restructuring.

That is all (and more) described by the term.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I wouldn't associate that with a revolution though. Similar to how the "Irish potato famine" was something the brits did to Ireland that's a thing the soviets did to their colonies, essentially and I would probably chalk it up to a type of colonialism