this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
491 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26306 readers
2812 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 29 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Can you share some source for this aipac claim? I mean, fuck aipac, but I just want to make sure we don’t go down the shouting about the evil Jewish billionaires controlling everything route.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Democrats are obsessed with Israel. This ain't hard evidence, but it's telling

https://youtu.be/Ms8tGyopFrQ

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

There's no "source", AIPAC deals directly with politicians and those discussions are not public. But we know that AIPAC gives lots of money to Democrats to the point that they can and have dictated policy, and we know that AIPAC's spokesperson has been on national news shows specifically to fearmonger about Mamdani. Most direct source here is gonna be using your noggin.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

AIPAC's spokesperson has been on national news shows specifically to fearmonger about Mamdani

Wouldn't this be a source?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

Not a source that AIPAC is telling dem leaders to stand down, which is what was requested.

But if you want to see it, Majority Report did a segment on it last week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4H84ZeYNN4

[–] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 6 points 12 hours ago

This is an interesting question and I didn't have an immediate answer. Let me start off by pointing out that many many Jews in the US are horrified at the genocide in Gaza and do not want to be associated with AIPAC at all. The Jewish community in the US seems to be engaging in very serious internal debate on the topic (https://mondoweiss.net/2017/03/daughter-defense-apartheid/).

AIPAC itself doesn't seem to have any direct statements about Mandami at all. They do make the dubious claim that "are more than 6 million pro-Israel Americans" (https://www.aipac.org/). Since there are an estimated 7.1 to 7.7 million Jews in the US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews) they claim to represent the vast majority of Jews in the US.

I'm guessing that OP is referring to a sermon by Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove (https://pasyn.org/sermons/2025/on-the-record/). I can't find any statements on if he is or is not an official member of AIPAC but he is generally described as a very conservative by various Jewish publications. Jonathan Shulman then encouraged rabbi's across the country to sign the letter. (https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-873068). He left AIPAC after 18 because "the group's brand was becoming increasingly toxic amid the war in Gaza." As of Friday, over 1,000 rabbis have signed (https://jewishmajority.org/a-rabbinic-call-to-action).

My read on this is that AIPAC is now known to be bad marketing and it's already getting rebranded; the people behind it will just regroup under a new name. While they didn't claim responsibility for the letter, their supporters created and spread it.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Brother in Christ, Democrats have been controlled opposition for quite some time. It wasn't until Bernie, AOC, Mamdani, and others of their class that began to stand out from the Establishment. With Citizens United, there isn't much of a difference in terms of which party sucks Corporate dick.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, I’m not refuting that. I’m asking about the AIPAC claim. Because, as I stated, this feels like the dangerous “evil Jewish billionaires” thinking that we should not idly engage in. Mamdani is Muslim, so falling into the trap that the Jews are behind this is…fucking dangerous. Why make that assumption without any evidence?

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 12 hours ago

https://www.trackaipac.com/states/newyork

$1.7 million from aipac to chucky.

Now don't take my word for it... Verify.

But he also went on record saying that his job is to keep the left pro-Israel.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 12 hours ago

AIPAC doesnt represent Jews, they represent the interests of the government of Israel in America.