this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

400 readers
47 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
  2. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  3. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Natanox@chaos.social 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@PugJesus Dear "History Major", that right there is not a US-made new tank but a german Rheinmetall Panther KF51. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panther/_KF51

I do agree that the most modern german tanks could sweep the floor with the Armata (and then have sex with its mother to assert dominance). Wouldn't even need a Panther for that though, a Leopard 2A7 already overpowers it.

[โ€“] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

That may be, I'm not good at identifying tanks visually. I assumed it was an AbramsX.

[โ€“] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

T-14 Armata

I know they were briefly used in 2023 and then pulled, but were any even killed?

It's very spotty finding combat information about them, and I can't find information if they ever actually made it into combat or if they tried to deploy and just couldn't even do that.

The T-14 is a non-factor given the unsubstantial numbers. The real practical tank in the field is the T-90M, which is pretty dated.

From what I read of the Panther, much of its design changes are seemingly focused on dealing with a drone heavy battlefield. Even if the T-14 is cited in press releases as a reason for the design, I doubt any engineers actually took it seriously.