News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Let’s coin a new word here: Doomnialism, like denialism, but specifically denying bad things are happening. Despite all the evidence saying the contrary, you refuse to believe something because it will give you bad feelings.
"Judges don't do chicken shit. Except all that shit they have done, but I've already moved the goal post, so who cares about all that? Not me, but I'm totally not trying to spread propaganda. You're spreading it with all your facts that contradict my false narrative. Which I'm only spreading because...?"
I don’t know what that drivel is supposed to mean, but I’m sure it is just that.
You do not have the ability to see the bigger picture because you are too busy celebrating a small ineffective victory. You refuse to acknowledge that it is not a victory, and will be shot down days from its decision. You lack foresight because you are afraid.
Focus your energy on the problem and not the people reminding you that there is still a problem.
Fuck off you collaborating twat rag
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-states-undo-steps-full-snap-benefits/
While I enjoy being right, I don’t enjoy being right about this particular topic. However, you are just dead wrong.
Again, your original argument is that the courts don't do chicken shit to stop the administration.
Your entire argument here rests on Trump being granted a temporary emergency stay by a democratic supreme court justice. That stay is set to expire after the lower appeals court makes a final decision regarding the second order given by judge McConnell, that USDA provide full SNAP funding vs only providing the partial funding the administration already agreed to pay after McConnell's first order was handed down the week before.
Why did the Trump administration seek an emergency stay from the supreme court in a district where they knew the case would be decided by a Biden appointee? Because the circuit court making the final decision on McConnell's ruling, declined to grant the administration a stay when they first appealed. The Trump administration then cited the lower court's refusal to grant a stay, to their running list of examples they claim are targeted acts of unfair "judiciary activism" by democratically appointed judges. In other words, they are claiming any orders handed down by judges that hinder the administration's agenda are politically motivated attacks against the administration, while actually carrying out politically motivated bullshit like using SNAP funds as a bargaining chip.
US Supreme Court lets Trump withhold $4 billion in food aid funding for now
Pretty sure you're well aware of this already, but when you argue that judges "don't do chicken shit,"/might as well not even exist, guess who you're actually helping by spreading disinformation and propaganda?
DOJ’s No. 2 Official Asks Lawyers to Join ‘War’ Against Judges
The DOJ is saying they are at war, and targeting the judges you claim with such certainty don't actually do "chicken shit." If you're looking for work, you'd make a very useful tool for the DOJ's propaganda machine. For some reason they need to eliminate those "useless" Federal judges and their meddling "judicial activism" that doesn't actually do anything.
If you want to wrap quotes around something that I said, make sure it’s something that I said not something that you are paraphrasing
Your argument was literally that JD Vance was correct in saying judges don't have authority over Trump. You then said you believed Vance was correct because judges haven't done chicken shit to stop Trump.
Then you continued to argue the courts won't ever be able to stop the all powerful king, despite those no king protests that haven't done anything. Again, you seem to know exactly what you're doing, and who you're actually helping by doing it. I'm done. Bye.
I don’t use the phrase “chicken shit”
My bad, I had you confused with somebody else who was also attacking the judges Trump has declared war with because they've done nothing to stop him from carrying out his agenda.
That’s ok, I can see how you’d be confused since it’s the majority opinion.
I'm pretty sure fascist collaborators aren't the majority. If they were, there would be no need for you to spread disinformation.
Wow you’re dumb. lol. I actually don’t think you comprehend most of what’s going on… in your life. I think you are having an entirely different conversation than I am because you have mixed up so many people that you don’t even know who you’re talking to anymore.
To actually think that a person criticizing the fascists are in actuality a fascist themselves, spreading disinformation for the lefties? That is just… medication level crazy.
Eat a dick bootlicker
Take your pills psychopath
Collaborating with whom?