this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
977 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

8492 readers
1688 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
977
Wow, it sure has come a long way quickly (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 day ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 88 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's clearly not AI because it doesn't have weird uncanny and wonky shit. Also the text on the monitor is readable even though it's blurry

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Exactly what I thought about the text

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ai image generators can pretty reliably do text now

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Not at that scale, they can do larger text fine but at a certain size it just breaks down

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

However, it is cool that she recreated that AI look to trick them.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's way less recognizable as an AI "art" style to me tbh. Maybe the studio ghibli one? But I haven't really seen art from that one and it even sounds like a stretch

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

it does look like that AI version of Ghibli. not like Ghibli directly