this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
798 points (96.1% liked)

Comic Strips

20074 readers
2293 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Apparently it's a thing. Like saying "it's giving (cha)rizz(matic) (vibes)" aka "it's transmiting a lot of charisma" or " it's charismatic", you gotta infer from the context what the full sentence means.

I don't think "washed" by itself is being used a lot, but economising sentences by removing parts and them being inferred via context IS something that is done a lot by young people. We used to just use initials, they are cutting words instead, lmfao.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wait... rizz is short for charisma?? 🀯

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, new slang is apparently mostly shorthands of actual words. Aura also is like charisma too, charisma so strong that you can see it around the person, so, aura.

They make sense.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago

Slang has always been shorthand for longer words or phrases, but I didn't realize rizz fit that category.

Even things like "speak of the devil" were once longer phrases. It's a natural pattern in language that common sayings are shortened over time. Really fascinating just how common it is.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, "aura" is ~165 years old, so not sure if that counts as new slang.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the way it is used, it is.

Saying stuff like "aura farming" or "that man has aura"

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That meaning is 166 years old. The word itself is around 500 years old.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/aura

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You are absolutely correct, but it equally correct that you have never said "Why are you aura farming?" to your grandma and that is what is new to the english language

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, "aura farming" might be a new saying, but the meaning of "aura" is not.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are absolutely correct, but no one said the word's meaning changedβ€” just used in new ways that mean the same but have implications based on context ;)

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are absolutely correct

...Found the LLM?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, but I just want to reinforce that no one is arguing against you here, even though your wording is as if you are at disagreement with others in this thread. No one is arguing against anything you say, we are just adding onto it.

You stating how long the words exist etc are appreciated as neat facts to the discussion, but they dont really challenge anyones assertions. Very cool to to be reminded of though! Using existing words that have been around for centuries and extending the meaning, not rewriting it, is how language evolves positively :)

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like you replied to the wrong person. Just pointing out that that specific phrase that ChatGPT absolutely loves using?

Never seen a real person use it.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I aint changing my habits because of some silly robot

but yup youre right lol. l blame the adhd

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah, and has been extensively used in games to express persistent area effects centered in an individual, but I'm talking about the recent use in describing someone charismatic. I'd be surprised if you found a text from 160 years ago with a semblance of "to have aura", classically it's a "strong aura", "imposing aura", "calming aura", you need to know what the aura is about to understand. In current slang "charismatic aura" = aura.

I guess that it's similar to the trend of saying that something is aesthetic or aesthetical when they mean that something is aesthetically pleasing.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I haven't personally found it, but that number comes from here: https://www.etymonline.com/word/aura

Curious what you mean by recent use? It's been in my vocabulary with that meaning for at least my entire adult life (~20 years). Maybe it's just become a popular word with younger generations in the last few years?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's gained popularity with it's bastardization. The concept of "aura points" for example I'm certain is new lol. Thanks for the source btw.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was extremely disappointed that it wasn't a Rizzo the Rat reference.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

"Who's that?"

-kids

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Kinda like British Rhyme slang, where you have to understand what the words are rhyming with to understand what they're talking about.

I mean look at antiquated English and how cumbersome it is. I feel like it's the nature of language to become more compact and efficient.