this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
1382 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

10043 readers
1009 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I give lemmy 365 days, tops, until we utterly despise the man for making political compromises.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I've already seen comments here that say he's toxic, simply because he's a politician.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You either die a hero, or live long enough to become a politician.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

Referring to tankie users/communities is cheating.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Had a pretty good government teacher in high school. Scored one of the only D grades I every got in life. (Unthinkable!) But she really nailed how politics work IRL. Not even realpolitik, merely, "This is how Congressmen live and operate. Here are the benefits and powers of their position." Nothing partisan either! Eye opening.

Raise your hands if you know the word "franking" and what it implies. :)

Other great points were that money doesn't mean the same thing to them as it does us. (SEE: Franking.) Need a new suit? Tailors will line up to make you one for free! "We serve the best of the best!" Need a table at a high-end restaurant? "Of course we have room ma'am! On the house!"

I am hardly concerned with US Congresses' pay. They get plenty of benefits.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, that is fair criticism.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Everyone is chronically upset on the internet is what I have learned

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Some people hate things as a hobby. I say that a lot, and I'm really serious.

Some people play video games, watch movies, or read books, and other people just hate stuff. That's their whole thing. They seek it out. They doom scroll until they find something to hate, and then they latch onto it and spread that hate wherever they can. Most of them don't even realize they're doing it.

I've seen so many good things fall apart because of this internet hate machine. It's sad.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish it wasnt so easy to hate all those things. Video games getting bastardized with monetization, movies being the same recycled shit year over year, and books getting censored so that kids won't even know what the originals are anymore. It all fucking sucks. I wish it was easier to just like things and enjoy them but god damn they make it so hard sometimes just to enjoy the little things we used to love. But that's just capitalism for ya

/rant over

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There's still plenty to like out there.

I dislike exploitative games as much as anyone else, but I just don't play them. But that's not really what I'm talking about, since that's a legitimate complaint.

Movies being recycled year over year isn't a thing.

Books being censored is an example of conservatives hating things.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It’s just the new innovation in hating. Instead of yelling at the TV it’s broadcasting your hate to others via social media.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

you sir have impugned my honor. pistols at dawn?

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Well adjusted healthy people living a happy life don’t waste their time arguing in comment sections.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

that's the way. not ironically or sarcasm. leaders aren't our allies, they are intrinsically antagonistic to the public.

we must elect who we will fight against. then keep the pressure on them.

might elaborate later. can't write an essay rn.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Semantics: an absence of rulers doesn't mean an absence of rules, and those are lesbian but not lesbians.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yhea, you need at least two of those for them to be lesbians, not even semantics just grammar

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Like slides rules?

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Friend just made a funny. I like funny, especially when it has the bonus of teaching me something new. No need to harsh on that buzz.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They're also teaching you that "anarchy means no rules"

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Oh jesus christ.

Cant yall motherfuckers chill out?

I get it. You would love to live in a utopia where nobody ever, ever, ever, tries to grasp for power. So would I.

But.... come on. Reality is a sonofabitch. And maybe you should try and live in it every now and again.

At no point will we ever experience someone not trying to grasp at the roots of power.

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but we could live in a society where those people grasping for power just for the sake of power would be shunned and cast out. Cause that’s how it used to be according to historian and philosopher Rutger Bregman. Admittedly, that’s been some long time ago, but still.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

What a naive take. Wow.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Dad was always taken aback by people who lust for "power". LOL, he was mad at people who designed parking lots to herd us around!

But I get it. A leader has to have some bit of narcissism to say, "I can do this. I'm smart and capable enough to take the reigns." Comes with the job.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Perhaps consider reading a few Wikipedia articles about anarchism. Have a pleasant day.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree, to an extent. If you decide not to support them because of one thing though, and decide you won't change your opinion, that isn't helpful though. If you aren't winnable then you don't matter. You need to hold them to account, but not be so strict you're a waste of effort. You need to be a target that they can actually hit, or they will move to a group that is winnable (or they'll lose and you'll get their opponent).

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

My dude he's the mayor of New York, that's literally his job. The mayor of New York is a lightning rod for all the frustration people experience living in the city. Mandani just took the most hated job in the world, sure he can do some good for the city. He's still going to be hated for it. That's just New York.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

I guess. But I still admire Bernie and AOC, so what do I know?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

the expectation of a single charismatic leader to solve everything is basically "great man theory" and pure fascist rethoric.