this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
106 points (96.5% liked)
Fuck AI
4512 readers
1288 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes. That is how the internet will be used, to a significant degree. Even today AI represents an extremely powerful and astonishingly human-adapted user interface.
The internet brought a vast quantity of knowledge together and made it accessible to anyone, in theory. In practice you need arcane knowledge to get what you want. You need to wiggle the mouse just so, need to know the abstract structure of the internet, the peculiarities of search terms, … it’s eminently doable but it’s not natural or intuitive. You must be taught how to use it.
If you put a medieval Tamil farmer in a room with a ChatGPT audio interface they could use it and have access to all of that internet knowledge.
I understand a lot of the backlash against AI but I don’t get hating on it because of how good of an interface it makes.
Unfortunately youre right. If it wasn't completely owned by massive corps pushing techo-facist ideology and mass surveillance, i could maybe see it as a positive thing. But it will not be used for good in the long run.
Right. So that is what we need to change.
You cant change that, short of sabotaging data centers or getting rid of billionaires.
Better to rally against it and not use it whenever possible.
Yeah, and how does that Tamil farmer fact check their black box audio interface when it tells them to spray Roundup on their potatoes, or warns them to buy bottled water because their Hindu-hating Muslim neighbors have poisoned their well, or any other garbage it's been deliberately or accidentally poisoned with?
One of the huge weaknesses of AI as a user interface is that you have to go outside the interface to verify what it tells you. If I search for information about a disease using a search engine, and I find an .edu website discussing the results of double blind scientific studies of treatments for a disease, and a site full of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and supplement ads telling me about THE SECRET CURE DOCTORS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW, I can compare the credibility of those two sources. If I ask ChatGPT for information about a disease, and it recommends a particular treatment protocol, I don't know where it's getting its information or how reliable it is. Even if it gives me some citations, I have to check its citations anyway, because I don't know whether they're reliable sources, unreliable sources, or hallucinations that don't exist at all.
And people who trust their LLM and don't check its sources end up poisoning themselves when it tells them to mix bleach and vinegar to clean their bathrooms.
If LLMS were being implemented as a new interface to gather information - as a tool to enhance human cognition rather than supplant, monitor, and control it - I would have a lot fewer problems with them.
Why would anybody hate on endless free CPU cycles? It's like handing out candy. Just gotta keep that "investor" cash flowing...