this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

948 readers
735 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Context: During the second Punic War, Hannibal kinda just vibed on the Italian peninsula for 5 years making alliances that weren't very stable and not doing anything except cause chaos.

Eventually he decides to march on Rome in 211 BC making camp about 3 miles away from the roman walls.

There was a cavalry skirmish and serious panic from much of Rome as Hannibal had just delivered some crushing blows to Roman morale during his adventurers in Italy.

However, the march on Rome was mostly a bluff. Hannibal was well equipped and skilled at field combat between armies but had almost no siege capabilities.

So his plan was to march on Rome before their annual army raising ceremonies. Except, he got there the day a 10,000 man army was sworn in.

The romans, however, are stupid and were ready to field an army against Hannibal, but a heavy storm was viewed as a bad omen/auspice by both sides. So they rescheduled for the next day, but it stormed again.

At this point Hannibal made some excuses and decided to leave.

Interestingly. The field he camped in was auctioned off while he was there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal%27s_March_on_Rome

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago

Funny enough, years later, when talking to Scipio Africanus at a diplomatic meeting in Anatolia, Hannibal suggested that boldness was one of the highest qualities a general could have.

Perhaps he had time to reflect in the intervening years!

With all seriousness, Hannibal was a major threat. The issue was twofold - first, that the Romans were stupidly, pathologically stubborn. Few other polities - of any period - would lose a full fifth of their male population and say "Fuck you, I'm just getting warmed up."

And second, related to the first, that Hannibal took the wrong strategy to deal with stubborn fuckers. He was never going to wear the Romans down, and Rome's vassals were both fond of the whole "They don't ask for taxes" thing and terrified of what the infamously grudge-bearing polity would do to them once Carthage's back was turned if any of them betrayed Rome, but had to remain neighbors with the Republic after a negotiated peace - ie, if Rome was not destroyed entirely, it would almost certainly destroy any of the turncoat polities out of sheer spite, even if it took patience in waiting for an opportunity.

The decapitation strike was his only option, not just a option. By failing to recognize this, he made himself a boogeyman for the next 500 years of Roman history, burned a decade in Italy, and thousands of lives - mercenary and Italian alike - but never made the progress he needed to.

Brilliant general! But military science was not a well-developed field at the time. I mean, hell, Hannibal performed the first double-envelopment in recorded history, man gets at least a little leeway for being a trailblazer rather than a perfected end-product!