this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
785 points (99.6% liked)

iiiiiiitttttttttttt

1298 readers
494 users here now

you know the computer thing is it plugged in?

A community for memes and posts about tech and IT related rage.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess now we finally know why Babbage never finished building the Analytical Engine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But to the user, it can correct their inputs. The rest is an abstraction. My point is that there’s more to a platform than just precise calculations. Obviously the asker isn’t thinking this far ahead, but Babbage is also rather flippant in his response.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Babbage was being flippant because, when questioned about his mechanical calculator, he didn’t imagine how computers might function two hundred years later?

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, that’s a hyperbole. I think there’s more depth to this question from our point of view than just what’s on the surface.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No, not really. Calculators still don’t have autocorrect, because the concept is nonsense. With language, there are true and false combinations of letters. More probable, and less probable, combinations of words. Coffee is a word, covfefe is not. But a calculator cannot know that when you entered 2+2 you meant to enter 2+3, as both are valid inputs, and neither is more probable.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Isn’t this just dependent on the level of abstraction? At the low level a CPU is just a calculator.

Presumably the user has a way to enter these digits. If they’re using a touchscreen, then there’s plenty of algorithms being used to make sure the intended touch target is triggered, even if they touch something in between.

There’s a lot of effort into making sure the user gets the intended result even if their input is fuzzy.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Articulate the utility of a calculator that provides the response of “5” to “2+2.”

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Well, it's propping up the US economy right now...

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Are you just being purposefully dense?

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No. But there’s no point in talking to a troll.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not trolling. Much like Babbage, I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such questions.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Then perhaps you should contemplate about how users view technology.

[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Like magic, apparently.