this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
240 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

The reason they're so scared is the current DNC chair legitimately wants someone like Mamdani for the next presidential candidate.

If Mamdani wins, that's enough time for voters nationwide to see socialism works before midterms and for that to domino to the presidential election.

I've been more optimistic about the party in the last 10 months than even 08 in the run up to Obama. The billionaires are fucking scared, and it's gonna make the neoliberals retire like Pelosi or run to Maga like Cuomo.

Edit:

Read/watch the full interview, but this was from almost 6 months ago:

Well, first, it was a brilliant campaign. And there's a lot of lessons.

One is, he campaigned for something. And this is a critical piece. We can't just be in a perpetual state of resisting Donald Trump. Of course, we have to resist Donald Trump. There's no doubt about it for all the reasons we just talked about. But we also have to give people a sense of what we're for, what the Democratic Party is fighting for, and what we would do if they put us back in power.

And that's really critical. And I think that's one of the lessons from Mamdani's campaign, is that he focused on affordability. He focused on a message that was resonant with voters, and he campaigned for something, not against other people or against other things. He campaigned on a vision of how he was going to make New York City a better place to live.

I think that's one of the lessons. The other lessons, of course, is the tactics he used to get his message out, both a very aggressive in-person campaigning, meeting voters where they're at, and then also in those digital spaces, using very creative messaging to cut through the noise and to get to voters in an inexpensive but authentic way.

There's a lot to learn from that campaign, and I'm excited to learn more.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/dnc-chair-on-the-path-to-winning-back-voters-and-lessons-democrats-can-learn-from-mamdani

Not to mention he's been supporting Omar Fateh for over a year:

https://www.facebook.com/omarfatehmn/videos/dfl-chair-omar-fateh-is-the-best-candidate-to-help-us-win-statewide/320417132678100/

Please, dont fall for the billionaire propaganda, they're desperate for people to check out of politics, we need to pay attention now more than ever.

Voter apathy is the only way the oligarchs can claw back the party, and they'll do anything to manifest that.

Including social media accounts that routinely deny reality and insist the only thing we can do is hand the party back to the oligarchs.

Don't trust anyone who acts like voting in the Dem.primary obligates a general vote.

Even if you have no intention of voting D, vote in the Dem primary and pull the party as left as you can.

There's literally no valid reason not to.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

the current DNC chair legitimately wants someone like Mamdani for the next presidential candidate.

Delusional. Ken Martin wants nothing to do with Mamdani. Neither do the party's highest ranking Senator and House Reps (ffs, Jeffries is IN NYC and won't endorse the obvious front-runner). Hochul has him at a distance, while eyeing his allies in the DSA stacked state legislature nervously for fear of a primary challenge.

And the irony of all this NYC leftism popping off now is that Cuomo made it possible when he gerrymandered his own party out of a majority.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Hochul has been at campaign events with Mamdani within just the past several days, it doesn't really look like she is distancing herself from him when you can find them literally on a stage together. I do agree about Jeffries, I think he is trying to be strategic because of his role in the House, but he sucks too much to pull it off so instead he just looks like an ass. If he was a better politician he could have threaded the needle. In some ways his non-endorsement may have ultimately benefited Mamdani, Democratic leadership is very unpopular right now and having obvious disagreement within the party over Mamdani validates his outsider image.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

I mean, it’s really simple, if they hate socialism so much, all they have to do is make life a little better for regular folks.

That’s the thing though, it’s either rich get richer for them or it’s hell.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No he does not.

Stop spreading such lies about “ I want to continue taking bribes from good billionaires ” and pretending he wants anything but maintaining the status quo.