this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
442 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

76558 readers
2417 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 22 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

This looks small enough to be installed within the wheel hub itself. Imagine a car with four motors, one inside each wheel. The entire floor pan could just be one thin battery, and everything above it could be passenger and storage space.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

PS

One issue I hadn’t thought of is putting traditional brakes (which generate a ton of heat) right next to the motors. Again, we're just asking for mechanical issues here, and we’re ballooning unsprung mass to mitigate it, especially in heavier cars that take a lot to stop.

The entire floor pan could just be one thin battery, and everything above it could be passenger and storage space.

This seems like a minor thing, but the control electronics for the motors takes up a nontrivial amount of space. So do “traditional” subsystems like hydraulics, climate control, or an old fashioned car battery (which often exists in parallel to the EV drivetrain).

Theres also safety to consider. A traditional sedan “hood,” even a small one, is easier on standing pedestrians, so it hits their legs and they flop on top, instead of slamming them like a wall (as a bus-like front would).

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That's how EVs started! Sorta.

This is from a Porsche in 1900:

in hub motor

old porsche hybrid

And some 2000s EVs tried it. But it's impractical.

  • It increases unsprung weight, e.g. weight not cushioned by suspension. Bad for ride/handling/steering feel.

  • All that vibration is HARD on the motor. Read: unreliable.

  • Motor is more exposed to temperature/dust. Again, reliability.

In reality, a decent suspension needs a lot of room under the body anyway. An axle to get the motor in the body is dirt cheap on the rear, and still pretty cheap on the front, and you could just mount this thing sideways to make it flat...

[–] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

That would be a lot of unsprung weight.

Handling and ride quality are dramatically and negatively impacted by every bit of weight that is not held up by the suspension. That's why higher performance cars will have lightweight wheels. Rather than steel wheels you see on lower performance cars.

It's better to just put all the heavy drive components inboard on the chassis and run drive shafts to the wheels.

You see motors in the hubs of bicycles, because they really don't go that fast. So even if the bike has a suspension, it's not that big of a deal. Motorcycles on the other hand would need to keep any heavy parts inboard.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Aptera wanted to do this with their flagship Solar Electric Vehicle (SEV).

IIRC, they switched to an outwheel motor because of the weight the inwheel motors added to the wheels. Could be wrong tho

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Aptera

LOL. Coming soon...since 2009

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 41 minutes ago
[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

Hub motors are a party trick. They will never reach mass market in a car.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They work well on bikes. I could appreciate 1000bhp hub on my 12kg touring bike. 🤭

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I agree, they are good for minimally suspended low speed personal transport.

[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

German company DeepDrive has some kinda promising tech. And the ID.Polo seems to be said to have hub motors.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

I only have german articles. I only heard it in the video source below, and they sadly don't really say how the normal problems with hub motors would be solved even though they have a section for it in the video.

https://www.electrive.net/2025/06/20/vw-soll-neues-topmodell-id-2-r-mit-radnabenmotoren-erwaegen/

https://youtu.be/R3Sok4ZbUyo

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Renault 5 RS Turbo has hub motors, Nostradamus.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

mass market
There’ll be 1,980 of these built

That car is the definition of a party trick. You proved my point, so thank you.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Renault 5 RS Turbo

That's because its a limited run show car. Its not meant to be practical.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine on a motorcycle.... Probably nonstop wheely 🤣

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Probably nonstop wheely

uni-motorcycle

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They make sense for scooters, bikes, and other low speed or two wheel personal transport. For anything with an actual suspension (designed for a highway) there is just too much competition for space with brakes and suspension linkage. The unsprung weight, exposed high voltage cabling subject to road debris and accidents are problems too. And what to do hub motors really gain you?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Less weight, less parts, 4WD, 4W traction control, more cabin space because no driveshafts.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Simplicity, no transmission. As to unsprung weight, designs like these have a ridiculous power density, so add only very little. Advanced suspensions are active anyway, so just part of the wheel robot.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They DO require transmissions! A single speed planetary gear set is still required, same as current EV drives.

Find me a hub motor datasheet with quoted power and torque below 1000 rpms. The YASA datasheets are all out to 8000 rpms. Useless at wheel speed.

They're quoting 30 second power numbers and dry weight without a gearbox. They're fishing for dumb money.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

A single speed planetary gear set

Sure, get semantic.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm looking for benefits over current EV drivetrains. So far, there aren't any.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

This is already pretty close to how many EVs are designed.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Except for the fact that that much power would need massive batteries. So your thin small battery would be dead the first time you mashed the peddle to the floor

forgot the part where they were excited to put the batteries on the tire