this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
509 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

76581 readers
2732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'm not sure how they concluded in their edit that 400kg is not a lot to shed.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The gains compound a bit too, 20 percent less weight equals proportionally less battery capacity required to shift the now-lighter vehicle from point A to point B.

So then you can cut the size of the battery while maintaining the same range, and that's where you start to get significant overall weight and cost savings.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Hell just replace the former motor weight with battery and you've almost doubled the range. If China ever mass produces solid state batteries, double it again.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Texas divorce.