this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
125 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

7676 readers
649 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well historically the industrial revolution began in GB and then the rest of the "west" as we know it today. All under existing structures of old wealth such as monarchies and nobility, eventually giving birth to capitalism.

The countries mentioned above were going through that same process only some decades later.

China is a great example because they are so thorough and totalitarian in their societal progression, they essentially forced through all this change in just a few decades and there is a lot of statistical information available that you could have a look at illustrating the process of an emerging middle class and their ultra rich class along their economical development.

[โ€“] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there is a lot of statistical information available that you could have a look at

Where are these statistics about China?

[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I dont know and really dont care to look them up for you. I would think you could google for whatever year and wealth distribution / productivity indicators of China, iirc they are fairly proud of what "the party" has done in that regard. Shouldnt be hard to find.

If you want to believe we germans live in some equality paradise thats your call of course, but we dont.

[โ€“] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

@GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip

You say there is a lot of statistical information available, but then you admit you don't even know where it is. Classic.

[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Why are you like this, fucking exhausting lol

I'm not trying to defend a masters thesis while taking a shit, thank you very much. My comment is based on what i know and learned about China over the last few decades, why do you treat this as some outrageous claim i am making?

Industrialization under a system of private ownership leads to a general increase in the standard of giving, yes, but still causes an extremely rich owner/capitalist class to emerge. In Europe that happened earlier, sometimes meshing with old hierarchical structures such as the nobility, in the other countries later.

What the fuck kind of proof do you want? Thats not contested information.

[โ€“] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Shouldnt be hard to find.

and yet...

[โ€“] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess the part I don't understand what you're trying to assert re: time since "industrialization" vs wealth inequality.

Are you saying industrialization is responsible for lowering inequality or creating it?

If you're suggesting it creates inequality, then I would expect Europe to have higher inequality than China. It does not.

If you are suggesting it reduces inequality, then I would expect China's wealth inequality to be trending downwards since the 70s. It is not. It has risen sharply in that time frame.

I'm still assuming that I'm just misunderstanding your hypothesis... so I guess my question would just be:

What do you hypothesize the process of industrialization does to weath distribution?

[โ€“] Melchior@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

Europe has industrialize more then 20 years ago. So inequality does not increase due to that process, but it does in China.