this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
498 points (99.6% liked)

Funny

12199 readers
842 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is this downvoted? 1kcal = 1000 cal. So 2500kcal = 2500 * 1000 cal.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is, which is only 2,500 Calories (like, the ones on food)

It's a crappy system where kcal and Calories are the same thing even though they sound like they are off by a factor of 1000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie?wprov=sfla1

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

This is why I strong dislike it when anyone from Australia, or another metric country, ever mentions calories.

My brother in weight tracking, kJ is right there on the packet.

It hurts.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, 2500 Calories with a capital C. 2500 Calories = 2 500 000 calories. So the correction is valid, but for some reason being downvoted.

[–] Zorcron@lemmy.zip 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because it’s unnecessary and pedantic. No one is confused when someone is technically incorrect and types “calories” when talking about food.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

From the Wikipedia link above

In the United States and Canada, in a nutritional context, the "large" unit is used almost exclusively.

In the European Union, on nutrition facts labels, energy is expressed in both kilojoules and kilocalories, abbreviated as "kJ" and "kcal" respectively.

So yeah, it's confusing if you're not American.

[–] Zorcron@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Fair point, I suppose non-Americans could be confused. But given the context, I still think this instance was very clear, and therefore the correction needlessly pedantic.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I knew I'd find this discussion in here. 🍿

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually Frankenstein's monster

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 7 points 23 hours ago

Actually, Frankenstein was the monster.