this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
658 points (96.6% liked)

Dogs

6008 readers
437 users here now

A community about dogs.

Breeds, tips and tricks about training and behaviour, news affecting dog owners, canine photography, dog-related art and any questions related to dog ownership.

Rules

  1. Posts must be related to dogs or dog ownership and must not be void of content.
  2. This is a neutral space. No bigotry or personal attacks. Criticism should be polite and constructive.
  3. No automated content. This includes AI generated imagery, post body, articles, comments or automated accounts.
  4. No advertising or self-promotion.
  5. Illegal or unethical practices are frowned upon, and any comments or posts suggesting them will be removed. This includes, but is not limited to, backyard breeding, ear and tail cropping, fake service animals, negative reinforcement, alpha/pack/dominance theory, and eugenics.
  6. No judging or attacking community members who care for dogs with cropped ears, docked tails, or those from puppy mills or questionable sources. While we discourage these practices (per Rule 5), all dogs deserve loving homes and compassionate care regardless of their background or physical alterations.
  7. No breed discrimination, all breeds welcome. Our stance matches the ASPCA's official stance and is not up for debate.
  8. Citing your sources when making a claim is encouraged. Misinformation will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca
isVeryLoud@lemmy.world
658
Confused by pizza (infosec.pub)
submitted 2 days ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/dogs@lemmy.world
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TranscriptionA Twitter post by Kylie Cunningham @kyyylieeeee that reads “today at the airport one of the drug dogs set off a false alarm and officers rushed over to find out the dog had alerted them for a piece of pizza. the handler just patted his head and goes "it's okay buddy i know pizza always confuses you" and gave him his treat anyways.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read everything humanspiral sent you? They’re nice easily digestible articles since you seem to be intimidated by whitepapers.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

so you have no answer to this:

We’re talking about cops, not professionals. The dog’s job is to watch the cop handler and bark when they indicate, but not be too obvious about it.

well, maybe don't say stupid shit next time. for now you can fly away and tell the other pigeons you won.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read any of the linked studies?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read any of the linked studies?

did you answer this?

We’re talking about cops, not professionals. The dog’s job is to watch the cop handler and bark when they indicate, but not be too obvious about it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I reeeeeeally have to hold your hand since you’re too busy master debating to scroll a few inches up and down on this same page. Why should I send you even more studies that you won’t read? You haven’t even read the ones you’ve already been spoon-fed. Yes, these links address my exact statement. You would know that if you read any of them.

https://lemmy.world/comment/20293009

https://lemmy.world/comment/20293055

https://lemmy.world/comment/20293204

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, these links address my exact statement. You would know that if you read any of them.

no these links to news articles, which i have not seen because their poster is on my ignore list, do not address your exact statement. also, news article is not a scientific study.

the only actual study you sent does not, again, address your claim at all.

have YOU bothered to read it? they all deal with the accuracy of the dogs, none of them suggests stupid take like "the dog is just waiting for its handler to tell him to bark".

we are talking about dogs working at the airport, i am pretty sure that law enforcement at the airport can check basically anyone when they decide to, and they don't need some elaborate fraud to do that, so your whole conspiracy does not make sense at all.