this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
306 points (94.2% liked)

Privacy

4126 readers
310 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

AB-1043 "Age verification signals: software applications and online services."

Text https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

Other info https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

California AB 1043 signed. Mandatory os-level, device-level, app store, and even developer-required age verification for all computing devices.

Edit: altered title from "ID check" to "Age Verification check"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Take it from a Brit... It's not about the children. It's never about the children.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

One of the architects of Project 2025 confessed on secret camera that the purpose of age verification laws is a de facto porn ban.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I'm sorry but you're using that term wrong. You mean a de jure porn ban.

A de facto porn ban would mean that you actually couldn't get any. And that's just ridiculous.

Like drugs are illegal de jure, but de facto getting weed pretty much anywhere in the world is not a challenge. Usually even easier than getting alcohol as an underage person. Not that I have experience of that in the past few decades (being underage that is).

I mean I guess it's "de facto" in sofar that it's not exactly presciptively de jure illegal when it's done like that. So in that sense you are right to use it like that, but eh. I disagree with who I was when I started writing this. No matter we're on lemmy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

Maybe for them. But for governments in general the point is that age verification is ID verification and it means everything you do online or on any electronic device can be surveilled and tied to your real identity. And that makes political dissent a lot harder to organize without being shut down.