this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
        
      
      307 points (94.2% liked)
      Privacy
    4126 readers
  
      
      196 users here now
      Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
 - Don't promote big-tech software
 - No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
 - No reposting of news that was already posted
 - No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
 - No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
 
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
 - !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
 - !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 - !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 
        founded 1 year ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
It is similar, not the same. Some other key differences to consider are that while the US one is at the OS level, it's just asking you to provide an age that isn't linked to your ID or anything. It's just like when a website asks your age, you can absolutely lie about it. But now it's being done on the OS account, not the website.
Whereas, yeah, it is just for games in China, but it is absolutely being run against the person's ID in a national database. Some games even require facial recognition. So it's on a whole other level of verification and tracking.
It's Age Verification, which will almost certainly mean either ID scanning or facial scanning via the device camera. Or alternatively card transaction verification - the OG method baked into all these laws is the one that pays MasterCard and VISA. ID and facial recognition are cheaper services because the business providing the scan service can make more money off the ID or face they scan.
"Almost certainly," is just you assuring it is so. Nothing in the legislation itself demands that.
The us is also openly capitalist with no other pretentions or pressures, and currently in the grip of a fascist regime.
I mean, sure? But that's rather broad and does not really pertain to the topic at hand which is potentially (or outright) privacy-breaking legislature enacted and enforced on technology in the name of protecting childeren.
Its the difference between fucking around with a gun in the hospital parking lot with your two EMT lovers who are trying to get you to stop, and fucking around with a gun in the deep arctic with two hardened killers who want you dead.
Dude, are you okay?
No. Shitlibs sold the government that was never exactly my friend out to fascists, and now blame me for it because libs dont have self awareness.