this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
1004 points (97.9% liked)

Comic Strips

20006 readers
2066 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catma@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (6 children)

We should stay on standard time. DST is fucking dumb

If we stay on permanent DST you get to go to work and school in the dark.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Split the two and make half way between dst and st permanent.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Getting there in the dark sounds just fine. I want sunlight during more of my personal hours.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And on standard you come home in the dark. I'm doing more after work than before.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, exactly. With standard time I go to work in the dark and come home to am hour of daylight. I'd love for that to be two hours.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 7 points 1 day ago

I’ve worked both day and night shifts. My experience with day shift is 90% of the people working it aren’t awake until 9-10am anyway. Pre shift time is “work” adjacent time.

Evenings, on the other hand, are the best. Having a day that lasts into 830-10pm is glorious.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

I would love DST permanent, but I understand that it’s not great mentally for school kids to get up and go to school in the dark. I would sacrifice that for the next generation to have a better experience.

But really we should start school later.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, you're only looking at one half of the argument.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago

I'm in an area that would benefit greatly from permanent DST. But permanent DST absolutely hoses those in the western parts of time zones in the winter.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The other half is that permanent Standard time is healthier for us.

[–] porkloin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In what way? Healthiness of a time standardization seems like it would be hard to validate. I personally prefer DST I’ve never considered either healthier or unhealthier. I remember hearing statistics about an abnormal number of car accidents and stuff happening the Monday after DST/ST changes. I’ve also heard some rhetoric about risk of car accidents with kids walking to bus or school being mitigated by standard time.

I’m assuming you mean something less acute than those which are focused on immediate outcomes like death lol? The only thing health related I can think of is daylight exposure and vitamin d levels, but it seems inconsistent whether people are more likely to take advantage of extra morning sunlight or evening sunlight. Seems like it would be a wash?

Anyway, I’m legitimately interested to know what you mean by “healthy”

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] porkloin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Did you actually read the link? The study basically attributes all of the negative effects to the change and not specifically standard time or daylight saving time, so I think what that means is DST is no more or less good for people than standard time. The switching is the part that is harmful.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I did read the link and ~~wonder if you read it~~ know you didn't read past the first few lines.

Also, this is literally everywhere. Go Google it. Ciao.