this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
316 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4525 readers
368 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vrek@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's also about several us states. Plus why make it harder to access porn? It doesn't harm anybody. It may make children ask some questions you don't want to answer but overall... So??

I'm for regulating porn, actors and actresses should be paid, should be protected from sti, should not be forced or coerced. But access? Who cares?

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

The article is not about US states.

There is reasonable evidence to suggest that children viewing porn is harmful, and even though it's clearly not a good reason - even if you believe said evidence - for something like the online safety act, people here act like you, as if there isn't even any evidence, and as if noone actually believes it's harmful.

If you don't think children accessing porn is problematic I think you need to give it some more thought. It most definitely normalises some extremely mysogonistic, violent/ non consensual practices.

I don't think age verification is the answer, but let's not pretend it's not trying to address an actual issue.