this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
rpg
4272 readers
1 users here now
This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs
Rules (wip):
- Do not distribute pirate content
- Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
- Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
- Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
- Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
- Do not advertise for livestreams
- Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
- Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
- No Zak S content.
- Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
- No AI-generated content. Discussion of AI generation pertaining to RPGs is explicitly allowed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I once had a GM whose house rules included every battle receiving enemy reinforcements each d4 rounds. One combat took three weeks to resolve. At the end there were four factions in the ruckus and it was taking about 60 minutes per round for him to run it. After the first evening we weren't even trying to fight anyone, we were just withdrawing.
So a lot of these suggestions need "...but not to the point of bogging down the game" added.
Actually if combat are long enough that re-inforcement have the time to come you're doing something wrong. NPC aren't stormtroopers who always miss, and PC aren't doing practice shooting. A combat shall be quick and deadly, if you're lucky one hit shall cause an injury, but usually an opponent doing a successful attack roll will at least incapacitate a PC.
In the same category, once a character lost enought HP to get maluses, I ask them to roll endurance (whatever how it's called in your game) to simply stay conscious, not only it helps preventing stupid death, but make combat faster. I believe some OSR games have a morale roll acting a bit similar
I thought then and I think now that a rule which can potentially increase the number of opponents every round shouldn't apply in every combat. And that running a TTRPG as a solo wargame with (very!) occasional participation by other players is a bad way to have fun with your friends.
So it is possible to have reinforcements every single round? Yeah, that is a terrible rule.
I have used a d4+2 to determine how many rounds of combat will draw attention, but only for a single reinforcement. The floor of three rounds is because that is 18 seconds in DnD. Enough time for other enemies to wonder if someone is just having a spat and not worth checking out or for the enemies to realize they are going to die and think of calling reinforcements being worth it over being ridiculed or punished by higher ups.
Good call. Makes sense in fantasy combat-context.
Runehammer has a nice video on Timers with some more examples.