this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
642 points (99.8% liked)

pics

25301 readers
405 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is no natural mechanism to uncompress soil.

Earthworms.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also Plantago and some other plants...

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

The level of cope people will produce in order to refute my request to not destroy fragile meadows is nuts. I thought I was being polite. And I'm right.

Once the meadow is trampled and the soil is compacted, and all the native flowers are gone, go ahead and plant some plantains there up on that mountain in the compacted soil. Problem solved?

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, earthworms cannot undo the damage from soil compression caused by humans. There are ancient trails that have been found by archaeologists that haven't been used in thousands of years and yet are still compressed. Human foot traffic is incredibly destructive.

The rule for hiking is that you hike and camp on durable surfaces only. Meadows are extremely fragile. There are visible rocks in this photo right behind this person, which they could be walking on. This is a selfish thing to do.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I did not correct you (nor did I voice an objection) on any point other than one :p

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fair enough. The way people are treating me for advocating against the destruction of nature is fucking disgusting. People are taking your point to mean that it's totally fine to trample meadows because worms will fix it and I'm an asshole for saying anything negative about this person fucking up a meadow for a photo.

Ugh. Sometimes Lemmy is exactly like reddit.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, you do come across quite like the Fritz (saying this as a German): "Das ist VERBOTEN!" A somewhat calmer approach to a quite harmless topic might get you more reach in terms of raising awareness.

I am quite sure that the problem is only ever in balance / the mass of people walking in a particular place. We are monkeys on this planet, and it is absolutely okay to walk through nature, much more so than flatten a forest to build a road.that we can walk on. People should maybe just refrain from walking off the paths in nature reserves / fragile ecosystems.

On a flowery meadow somewhere in the middle of a long hike? I don't see the problem.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

It really depends on the elevation. There are so.e places that are so fragile that it is very bad to step on anything not durable, like they are saying. But if you are down in the valley, especially in the floodlands, it is not going to hurt long term to frolick in a meadow.