this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
263 points (97.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8082 readers
748 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
263
MAGA singles are looking for love in Washington. It’s a challenge. (fedia.io)
submitted 5 days ago by Curmuffin@fedia.io to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“I felt like, being in conservative politics, there would be more, like, masculine men in the conservative movement,” Housley says, “and I find that a lot of them aren’t as masculine as I would have hoped.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It’s also not even in the same galaxy as ‘Leopards Ate My Face’.

I was initially going to write something about that. It's not your bog standard cliché LAMF, that's for sure. It's more complex. And that's a plus in my book.

Whichever way you cut it though, it's definitely in the same galaxy (or neighborhood, to take it down a few notches).

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not. At all. This is the sequence of events of a LAMF:

  1. Advocacy for a politician/political entity to do X, by person/group Y
  2. Y's advocacy is based on the expectation that X will be done to/only affect others, incorrectly assumed, because the politician/entity never specified such (it's not called the 'leopards eating [demographic's] faces party', after all)
  3. X indeed affects Y as well
  4. Y is surprised that 3 is true, though they shouldn't be, as they're the ones who made the assumption in 2, without any good reason to (this unjustified reaction is the LAMF moment)

For example, if Y voted to cut funding for public services, then got upset that a public service they use on got its funding cut, that's a textbook LAMF.

"MAGA singles are having trouble finding romantic partners" meets literally none of the above criteria. There isn't even an X (re #1)!