this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
264 points (97.5% liked)

Just Post

1156 readers
6 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I vaguelly remember reading how SUVs are 70% more deadly in collisions with pedestrians than conventional cars.

(Because their front is flatter and taller, so pedestrians are less likelly to roll over the hood and instead tend to be projected away)

I believe those kinds of cars started taking off back then.

[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

People buy SUVs because "safer" but they kill more pedestrians - and they're not strictly safer for occupants either. Big SUVs have rollover risk. Crossovers aren't necessarily any safer in a collision because it turns out that what really matters is the "area" of the car (length x width) and since crossovers and SUVs often cost more, you end up getting a smaller vehicle by area for the same amount of money. You literally get less for your money and it's also less fun to drive and probably requires more fuel. I honestly don't see why people without back issues get crossovers over wagons.

[โ€“] 87Six@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

A crossover is the worst of both worlds

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)