this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
562 points (98.8% liked)

World News

50630 readers
2430 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52036171

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 127 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I think the main focus here should be the word "influencers".

One thing is for a relatively unknown person to speak about any kind of topic even if they know nothing about it.

But when someone with millions of followers spreads misinfo, that is dangerous as it can end up killing lots of people.

People with a certain amount of followers should be held accountable for what they say the same way that a newspaper should.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yup, as someone who loosely follows streamer drama, this is kinda based.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Imagine the h3h3/Hasan drama if this was a thing

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

sure, but that's not what this is doing. it doesn't say they'll be held accountable. it just places a high barrier to entry.

i understand the sentiment behind it, but I don't think this will be effective at curtailing disinformation. it would, however, be a very useful tool for controlling online speech. especially with a government that has so much control over its universities.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If we held news accountable for misinformation then fox and all the other fascist networks wouldn’t even exist.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

That sounds desirable.

I don't see the problem with that.

[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

It just becomes a question who decides what is and isn't mis/disinformation. Imagine the trump regime doing this.

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I think if it's more about policing the misinformation influencers spread, then I can calm down a bit, although it still makes me nervous to think about the government picking and choosing what a person with a crowd can say.

For now, it's making sure influencers don't spread anti-vax bullshit, but what if tomorrow it's no talking about Palestine?

Even then, medical professionals themselves can fall to propaganda and spread lies, so we can't use a single person as an arbiter of truth.

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

There's a lot of nuance to be discussed and Republicans shouldn't be in the room at all when it is, but yeah this is objectively true. We used to have laws regulating the news for a reason.