this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
6 points (54.7% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8130 readers
255 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m using it extensively, for instance, I have to create contracts with businesses that I work with, and AI is really helpful, works within minutes, and I don’t have to get a lawyer involved (I have sufficient legal know how, to be able to check the texts). I ask Claude.AI many questions, which help me to find out about any kind of topic (eg I wanted to know more about mobile nuclear reactors and got a quick summary within seconds). Naturally, you should take nothing at face value, blindly believing AI won’t do you any good, AI does not replace your brain. I create marketing materials and personal profiles with the help of AI, and I’ve also improved my CV. I have even used it to write a message to a friend who lost their son to cancer, I truly was at a loss for words, but AI helped me to come up with some useful sentences (which I personalized). All in all, it is extremely useful, even to answer questions here on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

AI is mass surveillance

AI is identity theft

AI is privacy invasion

AI is built on theft

AI use leads to cognitive decline

AI is responsible for multiple child suicides

AI is environmental destruction

It is not possible to be an ethical user of AI tools at present. If you use them you are contributing to and complicit in the problems they create, which vastly outweigh any short-term convenience benefits. If you use AI tools you are participating in a destructive system.

Do your own work.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The only one that really applies is the last one. All the others are peripheral to the topic of this post and use of LLMs in general.

[–] NaibofTabr 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

All of the detrimental effects of using AI tools and all of the unethical ways in which training data is collected for them are valid reasons that anyone with any sense should object to their use, regardless of whether those effects are directly the result of any specific circumstances. There are more than enough problems that all of this crap can and should be generally maligned and universally avoided until the companies responsible for it fix their shit.

If you are not a conscientious objector then you are complicit in the damage being done.

All of it.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That's a general, sweeping statement meant to lump everything together and denounce it categorically, without regard for how any of those issues affect users or whether they're relevant under the guise of a nebulous altruistic motive. It's lazy and so characteristic of the most obnoxious brand of leftism on here.

Literally none of those issues, besides the last, is relevant to me or even OP's use, regardless of how little or how much we actually use the technology. I welcome you to expand on your points to prove each one without resorting to blanket statements, because I guarantee that none of them apply besides the last.