this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
567 points (99.0% liked)

News

37060 readers
2765 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He also said “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien. ICE using a mobile biometrics app in ways its developers at CBP never intended or tested is a frightening, repugnant, and unconstitutional attack on Americans’ rights and freedoms.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 107 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Interesting how it is the cowards hiding behind their masks scanning peoples' faces.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What would it take to scan/image through cloth masks?

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You joke but the answer is actually a OnePlus 8 Pro.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Hmm, seems like it's just missing the low IR cutoff filter, so you could mod any dSLR to do the same. I can't tell if it sees through masks well enough for facial recognition though.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Facial recognition probably relies on visible wavelengths, but you could probably train a neural network to plausibly convert an IR image to visible if paired with a visible light image of the unmasked portion. While generated images on their own aren't useful for recognition, I think an IR image would probably give enough information to make the generation useful.

All face recognition is unreliable though, so no one, especially not a government agency, should use it as a single point of proof about the actual identity of the photographed person.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

TSA and Customs both scan your face instead of your ID/ passport now for adults. It seems like the government has confidence in it?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago

They know who you claim to be and are checking whether your face matches that passport photo. They're not just letting anyone in who looks like one of the 330M Americans.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unlikely, without special enhancement. Those materials are not IR-transparent.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@Arcka@midwest.social care to explain what’s inaccurate about this statement?

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago

Firstly, you should say please when you're asking for something.

The claim was made as if they know exactly the materials the thugs' gaiters are made of. Unless they are an insider of that group, it's way too presumptuous.

Common natural or synthetic fabrics aren't as effective at blocking modern facial recognition as anyone might assume.

Here's a couple examples of someone putting in a bit of effort to actually test both common and purpose-built products against facial recognition.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Nothing, it’s not magic. Anyone telling you otherwise is either a lying huckster or a colossal dumbass.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

they are would be vulnerable to the same AI face scan as thier VICTIMS, people would have to be bold to pull down thier masks and let cameras record them.