politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I think the plan is that he runs as Vance's VP and then Vance steps down on day one. I don't know if that is Constitutional. Can Trump appear on the ballot as VP? I should think not.
EDIT: Apparently, it's possible, but unlikely. https://cornerstonelaw.us/22nd-amendment-doesnt-say-think-says/
Probably it will come down to a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, and it's not perfectly clear how they would rule.
Regardless, Trump will die sooner than later, so who is the GOP lining up as his successor, no matter whatever else happens? Who's next on deck for the GOP? Vance?
The 22nd amendment, which limits the president to two terms, also applies a restriction to a two-term president running as someone else's vice president.
The next option would be to have Trump be appointed as speaker of the house, which does not have any eligibility guidelines at all (like you don't even need to be an elected official first), and then have both the president and vice president abdicate.
But with all of the checks on power basically removed from the position, Trump would have to somehow find two sycophants who are both electable and would be willing to surrender absolute power just to give a sundowning octogenerian a third term.
Or, easier method. He runs. Democrats sue saying he clearly can't have a third term. SCOTUS declines to take the case because the constitution says he can run, he just can't be elected.
States wait for each other to take him off the ballot, since elections are state run and eventually none of them do because they waited too long and they are super-duper sure he won't win this time.
He wins, Sued again, SCOTUS declines to take the case because he's a sitting president and who are they to mingle in elections "we can't set a precedent of stealing elections from the people's choice" or something of that nature.
Opposition falls in line because, yet again, the majority of Americans decided he and the GOP were the best choice and they'll lose if they fight back. But really, if he wins a third term, GOP owns Congress and there's not a damn thing you can do about it anyway.
Boom, third term for Trump
Basically, laws are only good if they're enforced. Otherwise they're just words on paper.
Yeah, I'm tired of the "x law says he can't legally do y action, so we don't need to worry about it" discourse that the media keeps amplifying. The executive branch is in charge of enforcement, and he's made it clear to congress that he has sole control of the branch, and he's wielded that power to break so many laws already.
It's not like there's some constitutional overlord that steps down from heaven to put him in jail if he tries to run again.
Se can call one Romulus and the other Augustus, if it's not too on the nose
A few days ago someone laid down about 5 strategies, such as the one you say above, which might allow a '3rd term'. I wouldn't put it past them.