this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
131 points (97.8% liked)

Tech

2152 readers
117 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Vacant@programming.dev
131
Signal president Meredith Whittaker says they had no choice but to use AWS, and that's a problem (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 week ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/tech@programming.dev
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The solution is to break up Amazon's monopoly. In addition to breaking up Amazon itself into smaller competing companies, a large government like the EU can insist that these private backbones interoperate such that you can use local providers without the overhead of dealing with 20 different interfaces

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The solution is to break up Amazon’s monopoly. In addition to breaking up Amazon itself into smaller competing companies,

We already have smaller competing companies. If you read the article you see that Signal says that only a global company with its globally-integrated services can support the Signal application because of its requirements.

a large government like the EU can insist that these private backbones interoperate such that you can use local providers without the overhead of dealing with 20 different interfaces

I'm not quite sure where you're going here. Its not just a problem of different interfaces. The Signal app cites the need for global endpoints with low latency and a consistent platform for deployment of services including resiliency. You're not going to get that spreading your app over 20 different providers. Its even difficult for a single provider, which the most recent AWS outage proves.