this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)
British Columbia
1873 readers
1 users here now
!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca
News, highlights and more relating to this great province!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well this is just dishonest. Land acknowledgments just acknowledge the land was stolen by settlers. You do not have to believe in the notion of collective guilt to be in favour of land acknowledgment. It's not about ascribing blame to anyone alive today; it's about pointing out a problem that remains unsolved.
If you don't like the term settler, it's not even than. Just the acknowledgement that you're with on treaty land, or more likely, on land not yet covered by a treaty. I guess there's the implicit acknowledgement that signing and upholding treaties is a good thing.
I am having some difficulty understanding you, but I'm interested to get your point. Can you rephrase this perhaps?