this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40642 readers
111 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you familiar with nostr? It seems like a good place to publish scientific papers, but maybe there's a reason no one has done so. Maybe the nostr protocol needs to add a new spec for scientific papers or something

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For all I know, Nostr is a kind of social network with distributed identity.

The problem with publishing elsewhere is not that it's hard or can't give you reach.

It's the scientific metrics dictating your readership, job prospects and essentially your entire scientific career. Not only your ratings are affected, but also ones of your institution, so you have to play by the rules to have a job.

For your publication to count, it needs to be published in journals listed in certain international indexes such as Scopus and Web of Science. These indexes are, in turn, corporate-owned (by Elsevier and Clarivate, respectively) and the respective boards are free to reject (and certainly will reject) your independent publishing source.

[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sounds hard to solve. Maybe we need hobbyist scientists who get their income in a different way and just publish studies wherever they feel like, or something

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, if my career didn't rely on it, I would entirely skip the publishing part of science. It takes so much more work to communicate your findings than to make them. Of course, that doesn't help the cause since no one else will be able to build off of my work if I don't share it.

[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

DaVinci notebooks style science work 🔥

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 2 points 1 week ago

I'd say a noncommercial, maybe UN-backed index that is widely recognized would help.

Also, journal format is extremely outdated. We need to reform the way we store scientific data, and create an international standard.