this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
576 points (99.7% liked)

News

36965 readers
2413 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gnomie@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Not really, no. Just ask those who got fired by Reagan.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

That didn't work out as well as Reagan thought it would. And has been fucking up our air travel situation for the last 40 years. To do it again would literally kill air travel in the country for the next 30 years. People would literally stop flying.

Edit: to be clear, I'm not saying this isn't going to happen. Trump is a fucking moron who thinks of himself as the second coming of Reagan. So he will 100% happily fire all of the traffic controllers we have if they even breathe the word "strike". I'm just outlining what a god-awful fucked up future we have in store for us.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To do it again would literally kill air travel in the country for the next 30 years. People would literally stop flying.

From a climate perspective, that would be fantastic.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Given everything you know about America, do you really think it would be fantastic for the climate?

Because personally, I'm pretty sure people would just end up driving instead of flying, which is generally worse for the environment. Rich people would still be flying in private jets. We'd just see less commercial flights (and nearly zero general aviation), which would largely be replaced by people taking long road trips

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If it were replaced with massive investment into public transport and new dedicated high speed rail between US cities, it'd be a huge net positive.

A man can dream, anyway.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

It may still have a net positive on emissions if only barely, a flight to Disneyworld gets canceled and not replaced is generally good, same thing with non essential conferences and conventions. But it could also respin up road trip culture, IE packing into and going to Carlsbad Caverns instead of flying out to the Florida.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I say do it! Air travel is a huge waste and harmful to the environment. Maybe this will finally lead to better trains!

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Air travel is worse than trains, better than driving. Knowing America, people would only end up driving more. I personally don't think that's a good thing

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People fly because it's the fastest means of travel. The fastest trains will never be as fast as flying but people are also never going to be able to drive as fast as high speed rail.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You'd need to build high speed rail first

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Won't happen until there's demand which won't exist so long as flying is so accessible.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 5 months ago

Even once there is demand, it'll be an uphill fight against an entrenched opponent profiting from inefficient transportation, but I'm optimistic that eventually it'll happen.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Which caused domino effects that are still being felt. They can't do that again. There simply isn't anybody they can hire.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I keep hearing/seeing people say "they can't do that..." Then they do it with no repercussions.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It has nothing to do with anyone imposing consequences. There simply is no way to hire people for this job to replace what's already there. They can't even backfill turnover from retiring ATCs. Reality takes care of this on its own.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 months ago

just have ai do it

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

this part is true, they cant just hire anyone, because its already competitive asf to even get the job, plus thier are ton of medical requirements, a multi year training program, plus they have to accepted into tha tprogram in the first place,.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

and they cant hire just anyone too, because of how stringent the job requirements are, they have medical requirements, plus an extensive college program

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 months ago

I wonder how well that would work right now. You fire them all and then…. ask for volunteers? Since there’s no money to pay them with.