News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I think there's a bit more nuance with this one. I'm all for safety and all that, but the fact that one company, SawStop, owns the patent for the blade stop system that they're trying to mandate is a pretty big issue. Sure they've pledged to not enforce the patent if the mandate goes through, but that's entirely on their word, nothing in writing. The cost of a saw would go up if they don't waive the patent enforcement and manufacturers have to pay to license the technology (or some other related patent that the system can't function without). Also, if the saw manufacturers are also making saw blades, they'd probably end up selling more blades as a result of the blade stop, since iirc, the system shunts a hardened steel block into the path of the blade as soon as it detects an electrical current from your finger (or a hot dog in all the demos lol), which stops and breaks the blade in the process. Dunno if that would make up for lost sales due to higher prices, tho.
None of this would effect table saws that already exist, and higher prices may drive people to buy more used stuff, rather than new stuff.
On top of dealing with the SawStop patent issues, there's other things that could also help with table saw safety, like designing blade guards that people don't want to remove cuz they get in the way, that aren't addressed by this mandate. This NPR article from 2024 kinda talks a bit more about the whole issue around the blade stop mandate.
Not to say that this mandate shouldn't happen, I'm more concerned about it being implemented in a way that won't drive people away from buying saws with a blade stop system due to price
While I completely agree with your reasoning as far as it goes, I find it hard to believe this is the first incident of a proposed mandate where one company owns a blocking patent. There are reasonable ways to handle this, and most likely a pattern of previous examples. Why can’t the mandate take this into account.
Maybe the mandate could be contingent on them not enforcing their patent, maybe an independent testing entity, maybe everyone could compromise on smaller fees and objective qualifications so no one can be blocked. Heck, maybe it’s time to seize the patent by eminent domain, or to use that threat if needed for a fair negotiation