this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
1072 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

17269 readers
381 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Years measure time, not distance

[–] Spectrism@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yes, but it's part of the definition of a light-year, i.e. the distance light travels in a vacuum within one Julian calendar year. Using a year as reference to the distance light travels within a given timeframe is fairly arbitrary. We could just as well use light-months, or light-decades, or some entirely different timeframe as reference.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

On addition, we could measure year by a different planet. To the universe, choosing the time it takes the Earth to move around the sun one time is pretty arbitrary. Why not Mars? Or why not a totally different star system?

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 1 week ago

Speed = Distance over time.

There are no measurements of speed that won't face that problem.