Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Reset minimum wage to an actual living wage, with mandatory cost-of-living increases each year.
If a corporation has workers on public benefits (food stamps, whatever), then that corporation is fined twice the amount of public benefits each employee receives. If an employee working two or more jobs is on public benefits, then each company is fined twice the amount that employee receives.
Firm up Unions and Union protections.
Limit the amount of total compensation anyone involved in a company - including the entire C-suite and Board of Directors - can receive to, say, twenty times the lowest-paid employee. "Total compensation" to include stock options, bonuses, travel and business perks, etc. Also ban companies from employing / hiring / chartering private jets; if the C-suite wants them, they can pay for them themselves.
Semi-related to above, but not directly related to your question: For company travel, ban companies from sticking their employees in cattle class (whether travel, hotels, meals, etc). Nationwide mandatory rest and water breaks for all outside work (none of this bullshit where agricultural workers in Florida don't have water breaks). Mandatory rest and food breaks at work, with none of this bullshit where the break starts when you leave the line and it takes you ten minutes to get to the lunchroom and ten minutes to walk back. Mandatory sick time for all employees, mandatory vacation time for all employees. Hold companies that out-source work liable for the treatment of the out-sourced workers (none of these "well, those are independently contracted workers, so they set their own schedule even if we've given them unrealistic goals and will penalize them for failing to meet those goals".)
Overturn that law that says companies and corporations have a duty to consider the "rights" of the shareholders (which is where at least some of this "line must go up" shit comes from).
Ban private equity and similar types of predatory businesses / people from investing in human needs. That includes housing; water, sewer, electric, gas, communications and similar utilities; food production; whatever else is essential for people to live half-decent lives.
Actually and aggressively enforce wage theft laws, with employees getting multiples of their deserved payouts, company owners and directors facing personal fines and prison time, and the corporate death penalty for any companies deliberately or systemically engaging in wage theft.
If you're going to continue to arrest workers who are in the country illegally, arrest, prosecute, fine and jail the owners, C-suite, and managers of companies that employ undocumented workers.
If you retire and your income is over 100 times the federal poverty rate (which currently means an annual income of about $1,200,000), you don't get Social Security income, and use that money to increase benefits for people on the lowest level of the Social Security ladder. In a similar note, allow people on disability, Medicaid, etc, to have more than $2000 in assets before they start losing benefits. $2000 in assets was nice when it was set in the 1980's, but I don't think it's been raised since, and $2000 isn't much in today's economy. Similarly, the max-assets limit should get an annual cost-of-living increase.
No one "needs" more than two homes. If you (or you and your combined shell companies, it you and your family, or whatever other ways you find to get around this) have two or more homes, you personally have to live in that home for at least 90 days each year, with similar aggressive reporting requirements as inflicted on people who get Medicaid, food stamps or other public benefits. Failure to live in the home or meet reporting requirements means you have to pay some decent percentage [maybe 25%] of the home's current value to the [state? local?] government. If you fail to meet the "actually live here" requirement for a certain number of years (say, 10 years), your home can be auctioned off.
Limit the number of living units an individual landlord / company / corporation can own, run, or otherwise profit from. Limit rent to a certain percentage of the unit's same value, plus a maintenance/repair fund, plus some reasonable amount of income.
Heavily tax income over a certain amount. Tax wealth over a certain amount. Tax estates and inheritances over a certain amount.
Go over existing laws and start closing so-called "loopholes". Those "loopholes" aren't accidental wording in the law that people/companies discovered and decided to take advantage of; that was wording that was deliberately added to the law, at the behest and bribes of corporations and wealthy people, so they could intentionally avoid the law.
Probably a bunch of other shit, but this is a semi-decent start.
All of this sounds good, honestly. I’m cynical and think that loopholes are always present and there is a risk that applying laws that are too strict could push companies to move out (I know this is often also used as a cop-out to not do anything…)