politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Before anyone says that the truck should not have been doing that, ask yourself… Could ICE have just backed up and waited for something to happen that could justify opening fire?
October 23, 1983, two truck bombs killed 307, US/French servicemembers and civilians in Beirut.
Also was Coast Guard who opened fire, not ICE.
You could say that about anything.
"we had to shoot the minivan because in Iraq these have had bombs in them."
"we had to shoot that kid, because he may have had a bomb in his backpack."
"sure, that lady just had to die. She may have had a gun. Who could have known it was just a remote control?"
The reality is that the people shooting are helping kidnappers, Nazi's, and generally evil people. Of course they aren't going to show patience or civility towards civilians. That's not why the president has injected them into that situation.
They are military, and they are there to wage war on Americans.
Except it's the gate of the military base and there are procedures with dealing with these things. I get it. I don't think you should just shoot anything, but there is a line. This was the entry to the base, to the bridge that gets you on the base. The bridge itself is sensitive, and obviously the base is. This wasn't like cops unloading on a dude trying to get away because he's got warrants out. I just feel like the potential for negative results was much higher.
And these were CG security, if my understanding is correct. This wasn't Trump's hit squad, these were the dudes who have been guarding the entry point to the base for as long as the base has been there. It's literally their job, guard the entry.
I appreciate all your hypotheticals, but this real life situation is someone attempting to force entry onto a US military installation. That's the real situation, and this is how that sort of behavior is dealt with across the globe.
I'm mad about ICE too, I'm just not sure what they have to do with this situation, other than the protest being nearby. I'm not sure how the base security are helping kidnappers and being Nazis, unless your beef is with the military. Shit, I'll even say it's okay to have some beef against the military and how they've been used, but the Coast Guard? I can't think of any reason to hate on the Coast Guard.
I can find lots of stuff that hasn’t happened in the United States
And some might have even been in the past 40 years.
It happened to a US military base in a foreign nation, which, for all intents and purposes, is US soil. This truck was backing it's way onto a US base, refused to comply with orders. It got EOF'd. I appreciate everyone wanting to hate ICE, I think they're a bunch of bitches, but unless someone's has some legit proof this is some sort of false flag or anything, this is pretty SOP.
If bitches is the most extreme you think they are, it doesn’t surprise me you’re simping for them
It’s possible they thought the truck was full of explosives, and was trying to blow up the bridge to the Coast Guard island.
Sure, still not an excuse.
“It’s possible that black man had a gun in his pocket so I just decided to shoot him”
Congratulations, you passed. Here is your badge, gun, mask.
The driver was approaching them kinda aggressively and weirdly in a place where no cars should be at that time.
If you want to make an analogy it’s like a guy approaching the cops while threateningly waving a weapon.
Disagree.
It's also possible they thought the truck was full of robot centipedes.