this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
1227 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
5370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?

The answer is, a great deal.

Your answer is nonsense.

There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd say there would be a great benefit for a lot of e.g. disabled people who can't use the traditional inputs. Not saying that as a pro-ai/pro-win argument. Just that there actually will be good use-cases.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's not a use case for users. That's a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren't using the OS at all. Not saying it's not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't say that was a reason to gulp it down. Just that the use cases aren't zero.

Knew a quadriplegic that gamed with her mouth on windows. A really well working, integrated "ai" would've dramatically improved her life and saved her hundreds of thousands for all the equipment and tech-guys. And yes, that's a very limited use case, but would allow poorer disabled people to also use a computer better.

But that's really all good reasons I can come up with. For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

So you can't think of a single reason why anyone that's not disabled would want to use AI on a computer? No reason anyone would want to use ChatGPT? Generate an image? Re-write some text? Summarise some text or a video? None at all? Really?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I said baked into the OS. Noone needs that. Everyone who needs ai can open a browser. That was the whole topic here, not usefulness of ai in general 😊

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Being baked into the OS means it can do infinitely more than a browser based one can.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Name one really good application for baked-in? Nothing useful comes to my mind. And i'm not categorically against AI.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 months ago

That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all.

Ok you're so far down the anti-AI hole that you're just being ridiculous. No point even bothering. "Disabled people don't use Windows" lol One of the dumbest hot takes I've heard in a while.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your answer is nonsense.

There is no real use case for the user.

Showing your ignorance and short-sightedness right here. Just because you can't see uses, despite them being literally provided to you, doesn't mean there aren't any. It means that you can't think of them or understand them. That's a "you" problem.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity...

I'd say it's an all of us problem and a fucking stupid problem to have.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity…

This is just straight up lying though lol. All you're doing is showing your ignorance and complete lack of awareness of the world around you.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Demonstrate a single false claim

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You really think that the current "AI" has not done a single good thing? You think that no one in the entire world has been able to benefit in any way, at all, from using AI?

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 months ago

Ok well at least we know you’re not worth trying to have a rational conversation with now.