this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
964 points (99.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

27193 readers
1127 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
964
It was (infosec.pub)
submitted 2 weeks ago by lb_o@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

getting two computers to talk to each other is so so much harder due to NAT traversal

... which is why you will take IPv4 on my home network from my cold, dead hands, and why all IPv6 traffic is blocked in the network that hosts my PC/laptop

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thanks for holding us back, champ.

I guess fuck stateful packet inspection as a tool or anything.

NAT isn't a security measure you know that right?

[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

So you admit you can block IPv6 traffic in your rebuke to IPv6 adoption. What’s then the issue? Block what you want, it’s your network, but do it with a firewall and not NAT.