this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
856 points (99.3% liked)

iiiiiiitttttttttttt

1447 readers
73 users here now

you know the computer thing is it plugged in?

A community for memes and posts about tech and IT related rage.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

To be fair, MS says you shouldn't use it for caculations.

"Why is it there then?" No clue.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The example I saw them use was turning one line text reviews into a simple positive or negative so you can count them.

So it could be useful for things like that, even if we ignore the "then why not just ask for the star rating" that probably went along with that review...

MS is now an AI company that sells to excited bosses who would love to fire somebody somewhere to save a few bucks.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"... to save a few bucks."

In the short term, people who rushed into AI are finding out that a 1 in 100 error rate is absurdly high when literally every action is done through an LLM.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

At the same time, that sounds like something you'd just use old-fashioned sentiment analysis for.

It's less accurate, but also far less demanding, and doesn't risk hallucinating.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It’s less accurate

and doesn’t risk hallucinating

I might be mistaken, but don't these two lines mean the exact opposite in this context?

Is AI more often right, or more often wrong?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Both, because the way it's right and wrong are different.

Sentiment analysis might misclassify some of the data, but it doesn't risk making things up wholescale like an LLM would.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I used to work for Comcast as a mobile app developer. We used to get uncountable numbers of reviews along the lines of "I gave this app one star because you can't give an app zero stars". Honestly depressing even though I wasn't personally responsible for the apps or the company.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think someone dumb enough to cause problems with this is smart enough to read the warning?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

There's different kinds of smartness and dumbness and they are not always toggled on.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 10 points 2 months ago

Sounds like it's made to replace C-suits

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

you should use it write a beautiful poem! That's what calculators are for!

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

That is only there to cover their asses not to actually be informative

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

As far as I can tell, it's for people who already use excel wrong. The examples I've seen involve using it to process text in natural language (duh, that's what LLMs are best at). I could see using it to turn aggregated numbers (calculated using deterministic algebra, not Copilot) into a presentation, if you assemble the facts it's supposed to use, but at that point I'd just as quickly slap them into our corporate template and not worry about tweaking a prompt to spare me from having to actually exercise any non-technical skills.