this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
769 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11288 readers
1619 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

I remember reading a comment saying that women don't actually want pockets. The manufacturers and retailers have data on this.

What's happening is the women who do want them are in online bubbles that give them the impression that most women want pockets.

It's like how most gamers don't give a shit about DRM, so those of us who know better are stuck with it anyway.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

There is often a difference between “consumer wants” and “we will not profit enough to bother”

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The only data I could find suggests women do want pockets, particularly in pants.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It suggests that young women from the UK want pockets, yes.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I would wager that the companies that stand to gain or lose money has this data. Or you have the opportunity of a lifetime to start a company that would cater to a black hole of demand. I know what i'm betting on.

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago

Those companies also make handbags, which are substantially more profitable than pants with pockets as long as those companies keep handbags in fashion

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is the hypothesis that companies have their customers' best interests in mind? /shrug I'm just going to base my worldview on the only data I could find rather than "I remember reading a comment." At least until I run across new data.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Not at all. They have their own interests in mind. It isn't in their interest to make shit that wont sell 🤷

That data would be business critical for them so you can bet your fucking ass they have something like it.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Planned obsolescence, subscription degradation, ad creep, landfills full of cheap crap... It's in their interests to sell the least useful thing for the highest price. If it costs more to put in pockets, they'll spend a surprising amount of money trying to convince people they don't want pockets. Or better yet, just buy up every competitor until there are only a few players and decide amongst yourselves not to make better stuff. I'm not saying that's what happened, necessarily, it's just not a foregone conclusion that pockets are scarce because demand is scarce.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it costs more to put in pockets, they'll spend a surprising amount of money trying to convince people they don't want pockets.

Tin foil engaged.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Public perception can function like any other externality, meaning you can offload costs onto it. This is regularly done, but it'd be foolish to claim that's the case here without more information. As it would be foolish to assume the hand of the market is gently guiding us to a better world.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I really don't understand what you are trying to argue here. Who has said that the hand of the market is guiding us to a better world? I believe i said that companies work in their own interests. Their own interests is to sell more to maximize profit. They have, without question, tested products with pockets for women, because they aren't stupid. If there was a market for it, then they would sell it. Its not like copyright or trademark is stopping them like in other types of industries.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So you've got a very vocal market calling out their demand for a product that is more or less trivial to manufacture, and yet not a single entrepreneur has successfully brought the product to market. Why would that be?

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 3 points 5 months ago

There are retailers who have pockets in women‘s clothing by default but it does have some marginal cost. In a world of fast fashion, if they can get away with it, they will.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A quick search confirms that women's clothing with pockets does in fact exist, so the niche is getting served.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

It takes significantly more time in shopping. Online, the normal look at 25 items to find one that matches my style preferences and is available in my size, then add clicking through all the product detail tabs to try to figure out if it has pockets, 80% of them don't, and of the ones that do it's mostly hope that they aren't poorly designed where everything falls out of them upon sitting down.

I appreciate that, with a multiple of the shopping time investment required by men or women who don't value pockets, and some fallout in unusable pockets, women's clothing with pockets is available. But I sure wish it was more available.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

I became aware of this once in the office where a woman brought up the fact that guys were lucky to have functional pockets. Most pockets on womans clothing are either fake or are sewn shut and for looks.

I asked why? And she explained it ruins the "Pants Chi". I guess it gets in the way of showing off the figure somehow.

[–] LockheedTheDragon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

My SIL doesn't want pockets, but she is wealthy and into style. I think some of the women who don't want pockets are into style and/or looking wealthy enough to not need pockets.

Women who are pragmatic want pockets.

I've been ripping open pockets and sewing more fabric onto them making them big.