Funny

12199 readers

869 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

143

Double it and give it to the next person (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 weeks ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/55633776

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are lots of ways to fill a 2D space with a single non-crossing path. I'm sure counting the ways could be interesting to some. I guess you'd prefer a zig-zag oriented orthogonal to the sides, rather than the corners. This orientation fills the frame of a photo a little better though given the perspective. You could also make a spiral. I think the Hilbert space filling curve is way more interesting, but probably would make for a confusing photo.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I was thinking it would be interesting to see the functions for a given diagonal in OPs scheme, versus a row or column based approach. Then it occurred to me it might be easy to transform between these variants.