this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
595 points (98.5% liked)
LinkedinLunatics
6664 readers
2 users here now
A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com
(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Essentially regenerative braking. Should work, though the question is how coat effective.
Wrong question.
Right question: When the fully torqued spring inevitably fails, who is liable for the deaths of the rider and nearby pedestrians?
Wrong question. That one is answered with a EULA.
Right question: how often can we make that torque spring break, forcing the buyer to buy another one, without them realizing it's failure by design?
Wrong question.
Right question: How do we embed an LLM to decide when to break the spring so that we can score a 100B investment from OpenAI.
Wrong question.
Right question: What if we used a giant flywheel? That can't be dangerous, right?
Bahaha!! You got me! That's actually a really good one hahahahah!
F1 has been using this principle for years
That's just regenerative braking on a bike. Without batteries.
In theory that idea isn't actually bad although I suspect in practise the mechanism would be extremely complicated and would be liable to jamming it in opportune moments. That said doing this electronically is already a thing, although not really in e-bikes.
pretty sure hybrid cars have regenerative braking - the car uses the motion to recharge the battery when braking, going downhill, or coasting
Why flip a switch when you can just let the bike sense if it is going up or down hill?
Would make hilly terrain a much smoother ride.
Then again, if you do all that electrical, you already just have an electric bike. Which is even more versatile on flat ground.