politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, like you said, that’s Ur-Fascism, aka an academic definition they came up with in the 90’s that can apply to a lot of things if you squint right.
The historical definition of Fascism is:
Fascism is not merely a system of government; it is a system of thought. For the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State. In this sense, Fascism is totalitarian.
For Fascism, the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative. Individuals and groups are admissible only in so far as they come within the State.
Regardless, what does this have to do with ICE deporting people illegally? Any country that deports illegals is fascist?
I am responding to your insinuation that calling Trump fascist is a call to violence.
People use that word because they think it's an accurate description of the things he's been doing.
I do not think deporting illegal immigrants makes someone fascist. I did not claim that. The statement of yours I initially responded to said nothing about illegal immigrants. It was about the use of the word fascist.
To respond to the definition you provided:
Where are you getting that definition of Fascism?
I've found a number of definitions online, but I can't find the one you're quoting.
Maybe I'm just searching the wrong things, but I can't find any source for it.
What makes it the authoritative definition? Does it come from a notable scholar or something?
“Call to violence”
No, I’m assuming that if someone actually believes a true Fascist, Hitler-esque takeover is happening, I’d expect a vigorous response to remove them from power. That’s the traditional way to remove Fascists from power.
“Accurate”
Yes, because they’re using Ur-Fascism from the 90’s as some sort of historical standard. When you can look at those points and apply them to many different groups.
“Notable scholar”
My guy.
This is like you arguing about communism’s definition, my quoting Marx and you wondering what obscure scholar would say such a thing.
The second quote is from Mussolini, who knew a thing or two about Fascism.
The first is from Giovanni Gentile, widely considered the godfather of Fascism.
But I’m sure you know better than them.
I couldn't find a source, and you didn't provide one. I wanted to see where your definition came from, as I wasn't familiar with the source of the quote. My cursory online search didn't turn up any results, so I asked you for the source.
(I only searched quotes from the first paragraph, and didn't find any results. I assumed the two quotes were from the same source, and so didn't look up any quotes from the second source. That was due to a lack of research rigor on my part.)
Thank you for providing your sources.
I'm sorry for being dismissive. I was wrong.
I should have done more research before responding like that.
And I appreciate that, fair enough. For some reason people can quote Marx but despite talking incessantly about Fascism, have no idea what the original Fascists said that Fascism was.
Orwell’s quote about Fascism was pretty spot on.