261
Gov. JB Pritzker points to Trump inconsistencies in deployment of National Guard to Chicago
(www.chicagotribune.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
261 points (98.2% liked)
News
35749 readers
2294 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do you think this comment from seven months ago when Trump was president was ‘Whining that Joe Biden couldn't accomplish a god damned thing because of Republican opposition’ or ‘Whining that we need to "vote blue no matter who."’?
Aren't these your words from just a few comments ago?
And your words from apparently 7 months ago
You're right. Someone whining like that does seem fucking pathetic.
You didn’t answer the question.
It was an easy question to answer too.
You mean your leading question loaded with qualifiers after moving the goal posts so many times? I instead chose to stay on the topic that started this discussion by quoting your initial post and comparing it to your previous post where you're engaging in the very behavior you're trying to convict others of?
Imagine that...
Hilarious that you clearly lied while trying to say I lied and lied about the examples.
I’ll be saving this conversation for the future.
That's certainly a collection of words strung together. Nice job, bud!
That doesn't surprise me in the least. I know you'll also leave out all the parts where you've loaded your comments with qualifying statements while completely ignoring the broader topic in order to feel like you've 'won' by focusing on a very narrow and inconsequential aspect of my argument. Some might call that "fucking pathetic," but not me. I salute your bravery!
Care to reply to this comment that you ignored where I bring up all my responses to your ‘points’ there?
You said:
I said:
The first example you gave was clearly not either of those.
The second example you gave was:
Do you think this comment from six months ago when Trump was president (he created DOGE, remember) was:
A) ‘Whining that Joe Biden couldn't accomplish a god damned thing because of Republican opposition’
B) ‘Whining that we need to "vote blue no matter who’
C) Neither so why was it included as an example?
You said:
I said:
The first example you gave was clearly not either of those.
The second example you gave was:
Do you think this comment from six months ago when Trump was president (he created DOGE, remember) was:
A) ‘Whining that Joe Biden couldn't accomplish a god damned thing because of Republican opposition’
B) ‘Whining that we need to "vote blue no matter who’
C) Neither so why was it included as an example?