this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
63 points (94.4% liked)

news

169 readers
745 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

But doesn't that just prove the point? These shitty Dems are allowed to exist because people don't vote.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes, in part, and also because the party is actively trying to prevent those voters from getting the progressive candidates they want. It's more blatant these days (Bush, Bowman, Mamdani) than it has been in the past, but it was still happening. They don't want pressure from the left. They broke their promise to not support primary opponents (over incumbents) specifically when progressives started gaining ground. Many are openly hesitant to endorse Mamdani now if they aren't openly skeptical or critical. Vote blue no matter who, eh?

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

More specially, people don't vote in primaries or local elections.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not that we really got a presidential primary in 2024, but yes.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Yeah... more thinking back to 2020 on the general. Not that we had that many options by the time they made it to my state.