this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
62 points (94.3% liked)

news

169 readers
745 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We should run Mamdani in 2028. Those who know a little bit about presidential eligibility will cry that this can't be done. Those that know more about presidential eligibility will recognize that it's entirely possible for Mamdani to run for and serve as president.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, this seems pretty cut and dry:

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's been argued, though notably not in the courts, that this is superceded by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Everyone knows what the current supreme court would make if it.